Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265663AbUFVTxr (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jun 2004 15:53:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265109AbUFVTxG (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jun 2004 15:53:06 -0400 Received: from vana.vc.cvut.cz ([147.32.240.58]:65409 "EHLO vana.vc.cvut.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265678AbUFVTw3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jun 2004 15:52:29 -0400 Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 21:52:19 +0200 From: Petr Vandrovec To: jbglaw@lug-owl.de Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: Stop the Linux kernel madness Message-ID: <20040622195219.GA18743@vana.vc.cvut.cz> References: <20040622151236.GE20632@lug-owl.de> <20040622173215.GA6300@infradead.org> <20040622184220.GF20632@lug-owl.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040622184220.GF20632@lug-owl.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1968 Lines: 44 On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 08:42:20PM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > On Tue, 2004-06-22 18:32:15 +0100, Christoph Hellwig > wrote in message <20040622173215.GA6300@infradead.org>: > > On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 05:12:36PM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > > > Just merge the vmware modules upstream. Then, such breakage will be > > > detected early and probably fixed without putting a lot of work into it > > > (from your point of view). > > > > a) vmware modules themselves aren't under a free license > > That can be changed. Yes. > > b) even if they were there's not really much interest in modules that can't > > work with non-free userspace > > ...as well as this issue. They'd get some (limited but sufficient) free > maintainence for their software back. See? No technical issues 8^P The > very same could be said about 4Front's OSS drivers. I doubt. I emailed with Alan Cox back in 2000 (when VMware 2.0 was to be released), and he told me that there is no way vmmon & vmnet could find its way into kernel, regardless of license we'll pick. We do not have to go for examples very far - bochs currently does not provide any networking backend which would work like real network card, without any restrictions on MAC addresses, host-guest or guest-guest communications. Patch to get it to work over vmnet's interface was task for half of one afternoon. Would that change opinion of peoples who accept only free software? I doubt... So for now it will probably stay way it is - updates are semi-regullary distributed from my site, some distros picks them up and repackage for their customers, and everybody is happy that it more or less works. Best regards, Petr Vandrovec - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/