Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 09:30:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 09:30:26 -0400 Received: from [216.151.155.121] ([216.151.155.121]:59402 "EHLO belphigor.mcnaught.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 09:30:17 -0400 To: Alan Cox Cc: db@zigo.dhs.org (Dennis Bjorklund), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Data-corruption bug in VIA chipsets In-Reply-To: From: Doug McNaught Date: 13 Apr 2001 09:29:59 -0400 In-Reply-To: Alan Cox's message of "Fri, 13 Apr 2001 14:06:22 +0100 (BST)" Message-ID: Lines: 21 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0806 (Gnus v5.8.6) XEmacs/21.1 (20 Minutes to Nikko) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alan Cox writes: > > Here might be one of the resons for the trouble with VIA chipsets: > > > > http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/3/18267.html > > > > Some DMA error corrupting data, sounds like a really nasty bug. The > > information is minimal on that page. > > What annoys me is that we've known about the problem for _ages_. If you look > the 2.4 kernel has experimental workarounds for this problem. VIA never once > even returned an email to say 'we are looking into this'. Instead people sat > there flashing multiple BIOS images and seeing what made the difference. Is this problem likely to affect 2.2.X? I have a VIA-based board on order (Tyan Trinity) and I don't plan to run 2.4 on it anytime soon (it's upgrading a stock RH6.2 box). Am I safe if I stay in PIO mode? -Doug - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/