Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266249AbUFWPFH (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jun 2004 11:05:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266562AbUFWPFG (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jun 2004 11:05:06 -0400 Received: from e5.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.105]:29895 "EHLO e5.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266249AbUFWPEv (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jun 2004 11:04:51 -0400 Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 08:04:42 -0700 From: "Martin J. Bligh" To: Phy Prabab , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: slow performance w/patch-2.6.7-mjb1 Message-ID: <1945190000.1088003081@[10.10.2.4]> In-Reply-To: <20040623013419.18165.qmail@web51805.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20040623013419.18165.qmail@web51805.mail.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.2.1 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 753 Lines: 20 > So I configed with your patch just the basics and get > similar times that I do with 2.6.7 virigin and 2.4.21. > However, as soon as I enable 4G split, the rt > increases by ~35s (out of 1m45s compared to 1m10s). > Do you know if this is in line w/expectations? Is > there anyway to reduce this? Syscalls, etc will definitely be slower ... but it's not normally that severe ... what's the workload? And how much of hte increase is systime vs user time? (use /usr/bin/time, not the shell builtin) M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/