Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 12:22:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 12:21:51 -0400 Received: from mailout01.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.80]:9733 "EHLO mailout01.sul.t-online.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 12:21:46 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Andreas Peter To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: SW-RAID0 Performance problems Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 18:28:58 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] In-Reply-To: <01041313473002.00533@debian> <20010413180152.A13740@unthought.net> In-Reply-To: <20010413180152.A13740@unthought.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01041318243302.00665@debian> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am Freitag, 13. April 2001 18:01 schrieb Jakob ?stergaard: > I can't say much about this... It looks like your setup is perfectly > allright, and the performance *should* go up. Instead it looks like you > get a small performance drop from using the RAID. Most odd. > > Do you have more controllers in the machine ? If so could you try to move > eg. hdc to the second controller ? The only thing I can imagine being the > cause of the poor performance is, if your controller somehow doesn't handle > both channels very well simultaneously. It's far fetched, but it's the > only suggestion I can think of. The Board ist a Gigabyte 6BXDS (BX-Chipset) and 2 Celeron 533 I think the hardware is ok. > I usually get a good speedup from using RAID-0 on 2.4.3 with IDE. Both > with two disks and with six. This is with Intel PIIX4 and Promise 20262 > controllers. Andreas -- Andreas Peter *** ujq7@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/