Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263117AbUFWWYh (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jun 2004 18:24:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263324AbUFWWXf (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jun 2004 18:23:35 -0400 Received: from box.punkt.pl ([217.8.180.66]:22547 "HELO box.punkt.pl") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S263188AbUFWWWR (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jun 2004 18:22:17 -0400 From: Mariusz Mazur To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [ANNOUNCE] linux-libc-headers 2.6.7.0 Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 00:20:39 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406240020.39735.mmazur@kernel.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 957 Lines: 27 Available at http://ep09.pld-linux.org/~mmazur/linux-libc-headers/ Changes: - updated to 2.6.7 - some minor fixes Enjoy. Llh is all good and nice, cause it works (most of the times anyway), but with every new release the possibility of desync from kernel increases - downfalls of maintaining it as a separate package. Could anybody point me to some conclusions about how the thing should be done The Right Way (preferably with some input from high profile kernel hackers, so I can have some assurance that once something gets done it will get merged)? -- In the year eighty five ten God is gonna shake his mighty head He'll either say, "I'm pleased where man has been" Or tear it down, and start again - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/