Message-ID: <40DA0F7D.60606@pobox.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 19:17:17 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040510
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mariusz Mazur <mmazur@kernel.pl>
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] linux-libc-headers 2.6.7.0
References: <200406240020.39735.mmazur@kernel.pl>
In-Reply-To: <200406240020.39735.mmazur@kernel.pl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 966
Lines: 29

Mariusz Mazur wrote:
> Available at http://ep09.pld-linux.org/~mmazur/linux-libc-headers/
> Changes:
> - updated to 2.6.7
> - some minor fixes
> 
> Enjoy.
> 
> 
> Llh is all good and nice, cause it works (most of the times anyway), but with 
> every new release the possibility of desync from kernel increases - downfalls 
> of maintaining it as a separate package. Could anybody point me to some 
> conclusions about how the thing should be done The Right Way (preferably with 
> some input from high profile kernel hackers, so I can have some assurance 
> that once something gets done it will get merged)?


HPA suggested include/abi and I don't think anyone objected.

But that's most likely a 2.7 project :(

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/