Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263875AbUFXGKg (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jun 2004 02:10:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263865AbUFXGKg (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jun 2004 02:10:36 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:6868 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263875AbUFXGJg (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jun 2004 02:09:36 -0400 Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 23:09:33 -0700 From: Chris Wright To: Trond Myklebust Cc: Chris Wright , Andrew Morton , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make POSIX locks compatible with the NPTL thread model Message-ID: <20040623230933.M22989@build.pdx.osdl.net> References: <1088010468.5806.52.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <20040623122930.K22989@build.pdx.osdl.net> <1088020210.5806.95.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <20040623144150.H21045@build.pdx.osdl.net> <1088031727.8944.71.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <1088031727.8944.71.camel@lade.trondhjem.org>; from trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no on Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 07:02:07PM -0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 723 Lines: 17 * Trond Myklebust (trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no) wrote: > So what do we do? There is no way that we can keep the current rules, as > they provide no consistent way to inform the underlying NFS or CIFS > filesystem when to test for lock->fl_pid, when to test for > lock->fl_owner, and when to test for lock->fl_file. No bright ideas here. Each avenue I tried tonight was a dead end. cheers, -chris -- Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/