Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264176AbUFXKFt (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jun 2004 06:05:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264183AbUFXKFt (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jun 2004 06:05:49 -0400 Received: from corpmail.outblaze.com ([203.86.166.82]:28612 "EHLO corpmail.outblaze.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264176AbUFXKFs (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jun 2004 06:05:48 -0400 Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 18:05:43 +0800 From: Yusuf Goolamabbas To: Nick Piggin Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: finish_task_switch high in profiles in 2.6.7 Message-ID: <20040624100543.GB8422@outblaze.com> References: <20040624091548.GA8264@outblaze.com> <40DA9E89.9020801@yahoo.com.au> <20040624093440.GA8422@outblaze.com> <40DAA2D2.9010008@yahoo.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40DAA2D2.9010008@yahoo.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira MailArmor (version: 2.0.2-5; VAE: 6.25.0.62; VDF: 6.25.0.109; host: corpmail.outblaze.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 602 Lines: 15 > OK. They're both using 100% CPU... is 2.6.5 getting more work done? So far, it looks like both are doing similar amount of work. am getting more measurements from other boxes My concern was the high system usage, I had suspected that it might have been due interrupts generated on the NIC. This was not evident in the profile I generated Regards, Yusuf - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/