Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265418AbUFXUJP (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jun 2004 16:09:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265494AbUFXUJP (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jun 2004 16:09:15 -0400 Received: from kinesis.swishmail.com ([209.10.110.86]:62732 "EHLO kinesis.swishmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265418AbUFXUJL (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jun 2004 16:09:11 -0400 Message-ID: <40DB396D.4090000@techsource.com> Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 16:28:29 -0400 From: Timothy Miller MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Fao, Sean" CC: Pavel Machek , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Amit Gud Subject: Re: Elastic Quota File System (EQFS) References: <40d9ac40.674.0@eth.net> <200406231853.35201.mrwatts@fast24.co.uk> <1088016048.15211.10.camel@sage.kitchen> <001901c459cd_bc436e40_868209ca@home> <20040624115019.GA3614@suse.de> <20040624141742.GD698@openzaurus.ucw.cz> <40DB3263.40600@dynextechnologies.com> In-Reply-To: <40DB3263.40600@dynextechnologies.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1754 Lines: 49 Fao, Sean wrote: > Pavel Machek wrote: > >>>> What action should be taken can be specified by the user while >>>> making the >>>> files elastic. He can either opt to delete the file, compress it or >>>> move it >>>> to some place (backup) where he know he has write access. The >>>> corresponding >>>> >>> >>> - having files disappear at the discretion of the filesystem seems to be >>> bad behaviour: either I need this file, then I do not want it to just >>> disappear, or I do not need it, and then I can delete it myself. >>> >> >> >> >> Actually, think .o or mozilla cache files... You don't need them, but >> if you have them, >> things are faster. >> >> > I fail to understand the point you're trying to make. Are you > suggesting that a feature doesn't necessarily have to be implemented, > just because it's there? If so, the proposed idea on the "elastic" file > system differs greatly. Cached content, for instance, speeds up the > browsing experience *without* hindering the ability of the application > to function normally. Caching is a true enhancement --in most > circumstances. I can personally see no way to implement EQFS without > greatly exasperating end users with its shortcomings. > > Sean > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/