Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 06:56:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 06:56:28 -0500 Received: from zeus.kernel.org ([209.10.41.242]:17671 "EHLO zeus.kernel.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 06:56:18 -0500 Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 11:51:10 +0000 From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" To: "Albert D. Cahalan" Cc: Dominik Kubla , "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sct@redhat.com, sbest@us.ibm.com, linuxjfs@us.ibm.com Subject: Re: ext3 vs. JFS file locations... Message-ID: <20001106115110.D17728@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20001105024621.A29327@uni-mainz.de> <200011050253.eA52rfc515962@saturn.cs.uml.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <200011050253.eA52rfc515962@saturn.cs.uml.edu>; from acahalan@cs.uml.edu on Sat, Nov 04, 2000 at 09:53:41PM -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Sat, Nov 04, 2000 at 09:53:41PM -0500, Albert D. Cahalan wrote: > > The journalling layer for ext3 is not a filesystem by itself. > It is generic journalling code. So, even if IBM did not have > any jfs code, the name would be wrong. Indeed, and the jfs layer will be renamed "jbd" at some point (for "journaling block device" support). Cheers, Stephen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/