Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266242AbUFYUWs (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jun 2004 16:22:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266263AbUFYUWs (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jun 2004 16:22:48 -0400 Received: from mail.dynextechnologies.com ([65.120.73.98]:34342 "EHLO mail.dynextechnologies.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266242AbUFYUWr (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jun 2004 16:22:47 -0400 Message-ID: <40DC8981.7090703@dynextechnologies.com> Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 16:22:25 -0400 From: "Fao, Sean" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (Windows/20040616) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Amit Gud CC: Alan , Pavel Machek , Horst von Brand , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Elastic Quota File System (EQFS) References: <004e01c45abd$35f8c0b0$b18309ca@home> <200406251444.i5PEiYpq008174@eeyore.valparaiso.cl> <20040625162537.GA6201@elf.ucw.cz> <1088181893.6558.12.camel@zontar.fnordora.org> <40DC625F.3010403@eth.net> In-Reply-To: <40DC625F.3010403@eth.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Jun 2004 20:22:46.0706 (UTC) FILETIME=[2D9CE920:01C45AF2] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1439 Lines: 32 Amit Gud wrote: > It cannot be denied that there _are_ applications for such a system > that we already discussed and theres a class of users who will find > the system useful. I personally see no use whatsoever. Why not just allocate 100% of the file system to everybody and ignore quota's, entirely? Each user will use whatever he/she requires and when space starts to run out, users will manually clean up what they don't need. I am totally against the automatic deletion of files and believe that all users will _eventually_ walk in on a Monday morning to find out that the OS took it upon itself to delete a file that was flagged as elastic, that shouldn't have been. I also tend to believe that the exact time/date that the file was removed could conceivably occur six months prior to that Monday morning, without the users knowledge. Now the burden will again be placed on to system administrators. This time, to locate and recover the lost file(s) by sorting through months of archives. Personally, I prefer setting quota's on an individual bases, to finding a needle in a haystack In my mind, you either have a quota or you don't; there's no in between. Sean - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/