Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 22:52:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 22:52:44 -0400 Received: from runyon.cygnus.com ([205.180.230.5]:12539 "EHLO cygnus.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 22:52:29 -0400 To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Subject: Re: PATCH(?): linux-2.4.4-pre2: fork should run child first In-Reply-To: Reply-To: drepper@cygnus.com (Ulrich Drepper) X-fingerprint: BE 3B 21 04 BC 77 AC F0 61 92 E4 CB AC DD B9 5A X-fingerprint: e6:49:07:36:9a:0d:b7:ba:b5:e9:06:f3:e7:e7:08:4a From: Ulrich Drepper Date: 13 Apr 2001 19:52:22 -0700 In-Reply-To: Linus Torvalds's message of "Fri, 13 Apr 2001 19:29:20 -0700 (PDT)" Message-ID: Lines: 16 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.2 (Thelxepeia) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds writes: > spawn() is trivial to implement if you want to. I don't think it's all > that much more interesting than vfork()+execve(), though. spawn() (actually posix_spawn) is currently implemented in the libc. If anybody for whatever reason thinks it is necessary to implement this in the kernel look at the interface. It is really only interesting for systems with limited VMs but it would be trivial to add another flag which allow different scheduling characteristics which some people apparently want. -- ---------------. ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `------------------------ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/