Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264401AbUF0Ueg (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:34:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264411AbUF0Ueg (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:34:36 -0400 Received: from dbl.q-ag.de ([213.172.117.3]:23218 "EHLO dbl.q-ag.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264401AbUF0Ue1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:34:27 -0400 Message-ID: <40DF2F0D.6030804@colorfullife.com> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 22:33:17 +0200 From: Manfred Spraul User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fr-FR; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040510 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brian Lazara CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger Subject: [PATCH 2.6.7 and 2.4.27-pre6] new device support for forcedeth.c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1596 Lines: 43 Hi Brian, could you check the full duplex handling? I'm testing my new nforce-250 Gb (epox 8KDA3J) with a normal 100 MBit autonegotiation link partner and I'm getting bad performance (30 kB/sec) when sending. Half duplex works. The nic reports late collisions: nv_tx_done: looking at packet 233, Flags 0x28200. -> packet not yet completed nv_tx_done: looking at packet 233, Flags 0x1a810. bits 16, 15, 13, 11, 4 error, lastpacket, late collision, deferred, retryerror. nv_tx_done: looking at packet 234, Flags 0x8000. -> successful nv_tx_done: looking at packet 235, Flags 0x28200. -> not yet completed. Autonegotiation seems to work correctly: np->linkspeed is set to 65636, np->duplex to 1. lspci reports: 00:05.0 Bridge: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 00df (rev a2) Subsystem: Unknown device 1695:100c Flags: bus master, 66Mhz, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 11 Memory at ec000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) I/O ports at b400 [size=8] Capabilities: [44] Power Management version 2 00: de 10 df 00 07 00 b0 00 a2 00 80 06 00 00 00 00 10: 00 00 00 ec 01 b4 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 20: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 95 16 0c 10 30: 00 00 00 00 44 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0b 01 01 14 Could you give me a hint what's wrong? If you need further register values, just ask. Thanks, -- Manfred - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/