Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264704AbUF1G3h (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jun 2004 02:29:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264692AbUF1G3h (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jun 2004 02:29:37 -0400 Received: from pimout2-ext.prodigy.net ([207.115.63.101]:58262 "EHLO pimout2-ext.prodigy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264704AbUF1G3b (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jun 2004 02:29:31 -0400 Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 23:29:12 -0700 From: Chris Wedgwood To: Anton Blanchard Cc: Ingo Oeser , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au Subject: Re: [PATCH] __alloc_bootmem_node should not panic when it fails Message-ID: <20040628062912.GA4391@taniwha.stupidest.org> References: <20040627052747.GG23589@krispykreme> <200406270827.28310.ioe-lkml@rameria.de> <20040627222803.GH23589@krispykreme> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040627222803.GH23589@krispykreme> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 607 Lines: 17 On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 08:28:03AM +1000, Anton Blanchard wrote: > Unfortunately nodes without memory is relatively common on ppc64, > and I believe x86-64. From a ppc64 perspective Im fine with best > effort, perhaps someone from the heavily NUMA camp (ia64?) could > comment. Does anyone make ia64 NUMA hardware where you can have memory-less nodes? --cw - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/