Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265049AbUF1Pwh (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jun 2004 11:52:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265044AbUF1Pwh (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jun 2004 11:52:37 -0400 Received: from iris-63.mc.com ([63.96.239.5]:4054 "EHLO mc.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265049AbUF1Pw2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jun 2004 11:52:28 -0400 Subject: Re: DRAM and PCI devices at same physical address From: Matt Sexton To: Matt Porter Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20040626202648.B29650@home.com> References: <1088198580.29697.62.camel@dhcp_client-120-140> <20040626202648.B29650@home.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1088437874.3292.95.camel@dhcp_client-120-140> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4-1.1mdk Date: 28 Jun 2004 11:51:14 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1939 Lines: 48 On Sat, 2004-06-26 at 23:26, Matt Porter wrote: > On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 05:23:00PM -0400, Matt Sexton wrote: > > I have a dual Xeon system with the Lindenhurst (E7710) chip set and 1 GB > > of memory. In order to reserve a very large block of memory for a > > (user-space) device driver I am writing, I pass "mem=XX" to the kernel > > at boot time. Unfortunately, /proc/pci shows two devices now appearing > > in the reserved upper memory range. > > > > > The devices always appear right after the limit I specify on the kernel > > boot line. If I specify "mem=512M", then the first device appears at > > 0x20000000. If I specify nothing, then it appears at 0x40000000. All > > other PCI devices show up at addresses of 0xDD000000 and above. > > > > Is there any way to prevent these devices from showing up in the > > physical address range of my reserved memory? > > You could try using reserve_bootmem() to reserve your driver memory. > But then I'd have to modify the kernel. I'd rather just use a loadable module or user-space driver. > > Should they be appearing there at all? Does Linux make any guarantees > > when there is more physical memory than specified by "mem=" ? > The problem appears to be that the BIOS did not assign PCI addresses to the two devices. Linux (2.6.3-4mdkenterprise) then did so, but it starts assigning at either 256MB, or the first 1MB aligned page after the end of DRAM, whichever is higher. On my 1GB system with "mem=768M", this the region of my "reserved" DRAM. So, using "mem=" to reserve DRAM and having Linux assign PCI addresses are not compatible. Matt > Depends on the arch, I don't know what ia32 does. > > -Matt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/