From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: drivers/block/ub.c
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:46:34 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>, Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com>,
       greg@kroah.com, arjanv@redhat.com, jgarzik@redhat.com,
       tburke@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       mdharm-usb@one-eyed-alien.net
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0406281155140.1598-100000@ida.rowland.org> <40E045FE.1070104@pacbell.net>
In-Reply-To: <40E045FE.1070104@pacbell.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200406281846.34486.oliver@neukum.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1128
Lines: 28

Am Montag, 28. Juni 2004 18:23 schrieb David Brownell:
> Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Sun, 27 Jun 2004, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> > 
> > 
> >>Regardin #2 you say that ``that code isn't "very fresh and buggy", having
> >>been in use with all USB-Storage devices for over a year and a half'' and
> >>yet I observe that fairly serious fixes were applied just this week.
> > 
> > 
> > I have to object to the reasoning here.  That same sort of argument could 
> > be applied to almost any part of the Linux kernel.
> 
> I was also tempted to point out that the tone was objectionable.
> The implication that only Pete and Havoc have useful standards
> when it comes to code quality was ... offensive.  Looks like I
> just gave into that temptation, eh?  :)

Deep down in the blackest parts of your soul do you really think
differently about your own standards of quality ;-) ?

	Regards
		Oliver
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/