Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265207AbUF1VCU (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:02:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265213AbUF1VCS (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:02:18 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:47323 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265207AbUF1VBX (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:01:23 -0400 Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:59:48 -0700 From: "David S. Miller" To: Matthew Dharm Cc: scott@timesys.com, oliver@neukum.org, zaitcev@redhat.com, greg@kroah.com, arjanv@redhat.com, jgarzik@redhat.com, tburke@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stern@rowland.harvard.edu, david-b@pacbell.net Subject: Re: drivers/block/ub.c Message-Id: <20040628135948.5f8dca8e.davem@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20040628205058.GB8502@one-eyed-alien.net> References: <20040626130645.55be13ce@lembas.zaitcev.lan> <200406270631.41102.oliver@neukum.org> <20040626233423.7d4c1189.davem@redhat.com> <200406271242.22490.oliver@neukum.org> <20040627142628.34b60c82.davem@redhat.com> <20040628141517.GA4311@yoda.timesys> <20040628132531.036281b0.davem@redhat.com> <20040628205058.GB8502@one-eyed-alien.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; sparc-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: "_;p5u5aPsO,_Vsx"^v-pEq09'CU4&Dc1$fQExov$62l60cgCc%FnIwD=.UF^a>?5'9Kn[;433QFVV9M..2eN.@4ZWPGbdi<=?[:T>y?SD(R*-3It"Vj:)"dP Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 887 Lines: 17 On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:50:58 -0700 Matthew Dharm wrote: > I guess, in the end, what this comes down to is the fact that we're all > going to get bitten on the ass when we finally get to a platform where the > default alignment is 64-bits, which would then (by default) add padding to > the above structure. No it would not, see the other email I just sent out. Even when Alpha's could not address smaller-than-word quantities with load/store instructions, it _DID NOT_ pad such elements in it's ABI defined structure layout rules. It did word loads, and shift+mask'd out the elements it wanted as needed. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/