Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 07:58:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 07:57:58 -0500 Received: from zeus.kernel.org ([209.10.41.242]:11532 "EHLO zeus.kernel.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 07:57:46 -0500 Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 12:55:25 +0000 From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" To: "Marco d'Itri" Cc: "Stephen C. Tweedie" , Kernel Mailing List , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux-2.4.0-test10 Message-ID: <20001106125525.E17728@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20001102171717.L1876@redhat.com> <20001104194937.E3423@wonderland.linux.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <20001104194937.E3423@wonderland.linux.it>; from md@Linux.IT on Sat, Nov 04, 2000 at 07:49:37PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Sat, Nov 04, 2000 at 07:49:37PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Nov 02, "Stephen C. Tweedie" wrote: > > >2.2 O_SYNC is actually broken too --- it doesn't sync all metadata (in > >particular, it doesn't update the inode), but I'd rather fix that for > >2.4 rather than change 2.2, as the main users of O_SYNC, databases, > >are writing to preallocated files anyway. > What about fsync(2)? Will it update metadata too? Yes --- fsync has never had that problem. --Stephen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/