Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266142AbUF2XX1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:23:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266141AbUF2XX1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:23:27 -0400 Received: from e2.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.102]:57576 "EHLO e2.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266139AbUF2XXH (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:23:07 -0400 Subject: Re: per-process namespace? From: Ram Pai To: viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk Cc: Mike Waychison , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20040629221025.GI12308@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: <1088534826.2816.38.camel@dyn319623-009047021109.beaverton.ibm.com> <40E1DABD.9000202@sun.com> <20040629221025.GI12308@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1088551367.4788.49.camel@dyn319623-009047021109.beaverton.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5) Date: 29 Jun 2004 16:22:48 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 681 Lines: 19 On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 15:10, viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk wrote: > Note that sharing parts of namespace (which is basically what automounter > wants and what we do not have yet) is deliberate act of trust - same as > having a part of your address space shared with other process. Al, are you working on this feature(namespace sharing) ? If so, can we help? If not, any estimate on the complexity of this work? Thanks, RP - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/