Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266692AbUF3PRr (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:17:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266693AbUF3PRr (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:17:47 -0400 Received: from mx1.elte.hu ([157.181.1.137]:42883 "EHLO mx1.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266692AbUF3PRq (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:17:46 -0400 Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:18:57 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Paul Davis Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.X, NPTL, SCHED_FIFO and JACK Message-ID: <20040630151857.GA29070@elte.hu> References: <200406301341.i5UDfkKX010518@localhost.localdomain> <20040630150430.GA28506@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040630150430.GA28506@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-ELTE-SpamVersion: MailScanner 4.26.8-itk2 (ELTE 1.1) SpamAssassin 2.63 ClamAV 0.65 X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-4.9, required 5.9, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -4.90 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamScore: -4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 596 Lines: 16 * Ingo Molnar wrote: > A simple "strace -f" should show whether the setscheduler() call > succeeds or not. Does 'jackstart' do anything with glibc internals? it seems part of the problem is that the setscheduler() calls 'succeed', but the policy is not changed to SCHED_FIFO. The question here is, are the correct PIDs used? Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/