Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266781AbUF3RzW (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:55:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266796AbUF3RzW (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:55:22 -0400 Received: from e34.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.132]:36852 "EHLO e34.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266790AbUF3Ryb (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:54:31 -0400 Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:53:51 -0500 From: linas@austin.ibm.com To: Paul Mackerras Cc: linuxppc64-dev@lists.linuxppc.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] PPC64: (resend) Janitor signature of rtas_call() routine Message-ID: <20040630125351.U21634@forte.austin.ibm.com> References: <20040629154202.N21634@forte.austin.ibm.com> <16610.42236.698377.733729@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <16610.42236.698377.733729@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>; from paulus@samba.org on Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 09:33:16PM +1000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1394 Lines: 31 On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 09:33:16PM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote: > Linas, > > > Can you please apply the following patch to the ameslab ppc64 > > tree, and/or roll it upwards to the marclello 2.6 tree? > > This path is 100% pure cleanup; no functional changes. > > > > I got irritated when I was given a -1 that was cast to an unsigned > > int that was then cast to a signed (64-bit) long, and so I received > > a value of 4 billion instead of -1. This patch fixes this insanity. > > > > Different files were treating this return code as being signed > > or unsigned, 32-bit or 64-bit. The 'real' return code is always > > a signed 32-bit quantity, so this patch just makes the usage > > consistent across the board. > > I beat you to the punch on this one, I'm afraid. :) I changed > rtas_call to return an int in the prom cleanup patch I sent to Andrew > last week. You did spot a few places that I missed though, so I'll > send Andrew a patch to fix those up shortly. Well, your patch is not in the ameslab tree :( at least as of friday night. I'm working off of ameslab, is there a different tree I should follow at this time? --linas - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/