Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:59:27 -0700
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: inconsistency between SIOCGIFCONF and SIOCGIFNAME
Message-Id: <20040630125927.20395598.davem@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <40E27103.8040304@redhat.com>
References: <40E0EAC1.50101@redhat.com>
	<20040629012604.20c3ad8b.davem@redhat.com>
	<40E1BE7D.7070806@redhat.com>
	<20040629141915.0268b741.davem@redhat.com>
	<40E24573.5030403@redhat.com>
	<20040629221341.52824096.davem@redhat.com>
	<40E27103.8040304@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 708
Lines: 18

On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 00:51:31 -0700
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> wrote:

> David S. Miller wrote:
> 
> > This is especially unnecessary since rtnetlink does exactly what you
> > want already, so we don't need to add a new interface nor change the
> > semantics of an old one.
> 
> I do have code using netlink in cvs now.  We'll see whether people complain.

Let me know, if you can't make it work I'm more than willing to
reconsider the SIOCGIFCONF change.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/