Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S130485AbRDNXAM>; Sat, 14 Apr 2001 19:00:12 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S131976AbRDNXAD>; Sat, 14 Apr 2001 19:00:03 -0400
Received: from anime.net ([63.172.78.150]:54290 "EHLO anime.net")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S130485AbRDNW7z>;
	Sat, 14 Apr 2001 18:59:55 -0400
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2001 15:54:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dan Hollis <goemon@anime.net>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
cc: <stefan@hello-penguin.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, Dave <daveo@osdn.com>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: bizarre TCP behavior
In-Reply-To: <E14oR1o-00051n-00@the-village.bc.nu>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0104141553570.24529-100000@anime.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sat, 14 Apr 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> If the router claims to be RFC compliant then you may want to investigate
> trading standards bodies. In the UK at least things like the advertising
> standards agency get upset by people who claim standards compliance, are shown
> not to be compliant and are not fixing things..

Wasnt someone going to set up an 'ECN hall of shame' webpage to track
noncompliant vendors

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/