Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268092AbUIAEZq (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Sep 2004 00:25:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268083AbUIAEZq (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Sep 2004 00:25:46 -0400 Received: from mail.parknet.co.jp ([210.171.160.6]:39436 "EHLO mail.parknet.co.jp") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268092AbUIAEZb (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Sep 2004 00:25:31 -0400 To: Roland McGrath Cc: Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] cleanup ptrace stops and remove notify_parent References: <200409010011.i810BW5S001885@magilla.sf.frob.com> From: OGAWA Hirofumi Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 13:25:16 +0900 In-Reply-To: <200409010011.i810BW5S001885@magilla.sf.frob.com> Message-ID: <87llfubopf.fsf@ibmpc.myhome.or.jp> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 894 Lines: 16 Roland McGrath writes: > > Should we also clean up and improve those with user-visible change? > > Those should be thought as separate issue? > > The first answer to give is to the second question: yes, this is a > separate subject from the implementation changes we are discussing right > now. I don't really want to get into discussing a different interface at > the moment, because I have more than enough to do this week already. No. You are missing my point. This is user-visible change, not implementation only. Is it sane way to do user-visible change for preparation? -- OGAWA Hirofumi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/