Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268268AbUIBMJW (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Sep 2004 08:09:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268300AbUIBMJW (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Sep 2004 08:09:22 -0400 Received: from the-village.bc.nu ([81.2.110.252]:2190 "EHLO localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268268AbUIBMHK (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Sep 2004 08:07:10 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/ipv4 for Source VIPA support, kernel BK Head From: Alan Cox To: lkml@einar-lueck.de Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <200409021401.42255.elueck@de.ibm.com> References: <200409021401.42255.elueck@de.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1094123102.4996.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 12:05:03 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 568 Lines: 15 On Iau, 2004-09-02 at 13:01, Einar Lueck wrote: > The high-availability requirements drive those customers to ensure that > all routes are dynamic which is not possible with the proposed ip route > approach. Why. You are simply doing NAT for that port from all locally sourced packets to your "virtual" address ? Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/