Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/ipv4 for Source VIPA support, kernel BK Head
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: lkml@einar-lueck.de
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <200409021420.46785.elueck@de.ibm.com>
References: <200409021401.42255.elueck@de.ibm.com>
	 <1094123102.4996.10.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <200409021420.46785.elueck@de.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <1094124266.4970.20.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 12:24:27 +0100
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 727
Lines: 15

On Iau, 2004-09-02 at 13:20, Einar Lueck wrote:
> You. As we pointed out in the other part of the mail iptables NAT is not an option 
> for the relevant customers.

You've failed as far as I can see to explain why NAT doesn't do the
right thing in this case. I don't care whether the customers like it, I
care whether it works. If it works then we don't need to add junk to the
kernel. If it works but is hard to configure then its an opportunity to
write a nice tool to manage it.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/