Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269175AbUIBVhq (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Sep 2004 17:37:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269206AbUIBVgf (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Sep 2004 17:36:35 -0400 Received: from mail2.speakeasy.net ([216.254.0.202]:21916 "EHLO mail2.speakeasy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269184AbUIBVfV (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Sep 2004 17:35:21 -0400 Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 14:35:18 -0700 Message-Id: <200409022135.i82LZIBh003782@magilla.sf.frob.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Roland McGrath To: "Makhlis, Lev" Cc: "'akpm@osdl.org'" , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix rusage semantics In-Reply-To: Makhlis, Lev's message of Thursday, 2 September 2004 16:29:08 -0500 X-Fcc: ~/Mail/linus X-Zippy-Says: Th' PINK SOCK... soaking... soaking... soaking... Th' PINK SOCK... washing... washing... washing... Th' PINK SOCK... rinsing... rinsing... rinsing... Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 691 Lines: 18 I have no special opinions about what /proc files should report. That has always been all quite ill-specified as far as I'm concerned. > In an ideal world, I think /proc/PID/stat would report aggregate resource > usage for the process, and /proc/PID/task/TID/stat would have resource > usage for individual threads (in case anyone cares). I'm including a > patch against 2.6.9-rc1-bk9 that does just that. Sounds fine to me. Thanks, Roland - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/