Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269167AbUIBWjG (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Sep 2004 18:39:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269158AbUIBWfq (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Sep 2004 18:35:46 -0400 Received: from ned.cc.purdue.edu ([128.210.189.24]:16768 "EHLO ned.cc.purdue.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269153AbUIBWcn (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Sep 2004 18:32:43 -0400 From: Patrick Finnegan To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: BUG in smbfs Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 17:32:38 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200409021732.38622.pat@computer-refuge.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 583 Lines: 14 It appears that smbfs in 2.6.x (tested on 2.6.5, 2.6.7, and 2.6.8.1) no longer honors the uid= and gid= options, as it did in 2.4.x. Is this by-design, or has something accidentally changed? Pat -- Purdue University ITAP/RCS --- http://www.itap.purdue.edu/rcs/ The Computer Refuge --- http://computer-refuge.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/