Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269582AbUICDSV (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Sep 2004 23:18:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269056AbUICDSS (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Sep 2004 23:18:18 -0400 Received: from tomts10.bellnexxia.net ([209.226.175.54]:50327 "EHLO tomts10-srv.bellnexxia.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269581AbUICDRd (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Sep 2004 23:17:33 -0400 Subject: Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-R0 From: Eric St-Laurent To: Lee Revell Cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel , "K.R. Foley" , Felipe Alfaro Solana , Daniel Schmitt , Mark_H_Johnson@raytheon.com, "P.O. Gaillard" In-Reply-To: <1094171082.19760.7.camel@krustophenia.net> References: <20040902063335.GA17657@elte.hu> <20040902065549.GA18860@elte.hu> <20040902111003.GA4256@elte.hu> <20040902215728.GA28571@elte.hu> <1094162812.1347.54.camel@krustophenia.net> <20040902221402.GA29434@elte.hu> <1094171082.19760.7.camel@krustophenia.net> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1094181447.4815.6.camel@orbiter> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 23:17:27 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1303 Lines: 35 > Judging from these graphs, all of the latency issues are solved, at > least on my UP hardware, and the latencies seem to be getting very close > to the limits of what the hardware can do: > > http://krustophenia.net/testresults.php?dataset=2.6.9-rc1-Q6#/var/www/2.6.9-rc1-Q6/jack-test-1 > > The worst case latency is only 160 usecs, and the vast majority fall > into the pattern from 0 to 120 usecs. All of the spikes above 120 are > almost certainly caused by netdev_max_backlog. However these are not > long enough to cause any problems with my workload; the lowest practical > latency for audio work is around 0.66 ms (32 frames at 48khz). Lee, A few weeks ago you wrote that "the worst latency I was able to trigger was 46 usecs", now it's 160 usecs. Ingo has done much work on his patches since then. Why the worst latency is higher now? I presume that the latency measurements technique are more accurate and the 46 usecs was inaccurate? Ref: http://uwsg.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0407.3/0994.html Best regards, Eric St-Laurent - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/