Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 15 Apr 2001 20:18:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 15 Apr 2001 20:18:02 -0400 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:52231 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 15 Apr 2001 20:17:46 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] NTFS comment expanded, small fix. To: aia21@cam.ac.uk (Anton Altaparmakov) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 01:18:12 +0100 (BST) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), aia21@cus.cam.ac.uk, R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl (Rogier Wolff), Linus.Torvalds@Helsinki.FI (Linus Torvalds), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.2.20010416004856.00a572a0@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk> from "Anton Altaparmakov" at Apr 16, 2001 12:52:50 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > If you have the diffs ready then it would be great if you could do that. > (Did the maxbytes stuff enter the mainstream kernel yet? Are you going to > feed them together? Or will that be dropped for now?) maxbytes got to Linus. The checks using it are not all there, but maxbytes went in early to avoid fs differences being hard to maintain. I've fed him bits of the fs checking this time. There is some negotiation to be done over truncate yet - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/