Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269003AbUICOtJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Sep 2004 10:49:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269018AbUICOtI (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Sep 2004 10:49:08 -0400 Received: from jade.spiritone.com ([216.99.193.136]:32671 "EHLO jade.spiritone.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269003AbUICOtG (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Sep 2004 10:49:06 -0400 Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2004 07:48:41 -0700 From: "Martin J. Bligh" To: Zwane Mwaikambo , Linux Kernel cc: Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Matt Mackall , William Lee Irwin III , Keith Owens Subject: Re: [PATCH][0/8] Arch agnostic completely out of line locks Message-ID: <393510000.1094222920@[10.10.2.4]> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.2.1 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 599 Lines: 15 > This patch achieves out of line spinlocks by creating kernel/spinlock.c > and using the _raw_* inline locking functions. ... > Size differences are with CONFIG_PREEMPT enabled since we wanted to > determine how much could be saved by moving that lot out of line too. So does this have no performance impact at all? or has that not been measured? M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/