Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266195AbUIDVRG (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Sep 2004 17:17:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266196AbUIDVRG (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Sep 2004 17:17:06 -0400 Received: from pop.gmx.de ([213.165.64.20]:55985 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S266195AbUIDVRB (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Sep 2004 17:17:01 -0400 X-Authenticated: #8834078 From: Dominik Karall To: Lee Revell Subject: Re: NVIDIA Driver 1.0-6111 fix Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2004 23:22:47 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 Cc: Tim Fairchild , Christoph Hellwig , Sid Boyce , linux-kernel References: <41390988.2010503@blueyonder.co.uk> <200409041954.05272.tim@bcs4me.com> <1094327788.6575.209.camel@krustophenia.net> In-Reply-To: <1094327788.6575.209.camel@krustophenia.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200409042322.50478.dominik.karall@gmx.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2086 Lines: 44 so which (in this case) graphic card should we buy? i bought my nvidia card, because i knew that nvidia hands out linux drivers, even if they are binary only, but i knew that they do, so i didn't want to buy another card and realize afterwards that it absolutely isn't supported under linux. regards, dominik On Saturday 04 September 2004 21:56, Lee Revell wrote: > On Sat, 2004-09-04 at 05:54, Tim Fairchild wrote: > > The nvidia module compiles fine with the non mm kernel but will > > not compile with the mm patches for me. > > The nvidia module is binary-only. You are not compiling it, AIUI the > installer fetches the binary module from the nvidia site and builds some > wrappers. Even if this process were to succeed the result would almost > certainly not work. This is the reason you need open source software. > > Judging from all the tainted-kernel OOPS'es that get posted here, it > would appear that the majority of Linux users are perfectly willing to > buy hardware that requires binary-only drivers. People do not seem to > understand that there is absolutely NO incentive for vendors to open > their source if you would buy it just the same with a binary driver! > > I bet 99.9% of the people who signed that stupid petition already own > freaking ATI hardware. The people yelling the loudest seem to be those > who didn't realize the hardware wasn't Linux compatible when they bought > it, when it would have taken 10 seconds to find out. Why should they > give you an open source driver now, when you were perfectly willing to > buy it without one? Because you threaten not to buy another? > Bwahahahahaha. > > The only kind of democracy hardware vendors understand is voting with > your wallet. Personally I don't care, all the drivers I use are open > source, but the whining is getting tiresome. > > Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/