Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266147AbUIEDmv (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Sep 2004 23:42:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266181AbUIEDmv (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Sep 2004 23:42:51 -0400 Received: from mustang.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.3]:57738 "HELO mustang.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S266147AbUIEDmu (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Sep 2004 23:42:50 -0400 Subject: Re: New proposed DRM interface design From: Lee Revell To: Horst von Brand Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Dave Airlie , Keith Whitwell , Jon Smirl , dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel In-Reply-To: <200409050210.i852AvrM032012@localhost.localdomain> References: <200409050210.i852AvrM032012@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1094355779.6575.609.camel@krustophenia.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 23:42:59 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 696 Lines: 22 On Sat, 2004-09-04 at 22:10, Horst von Brand wrote: > Lee Revell said: > > [...] > > > Wrong and wrong. If you run Debian unstable (which is WAY more stable > > than, say, FC2) then you can apt-get upgrade to the latest kernel. > > What makes you say this? I've seen no stability problems with FC2. Eh, my brain was not working right, I completely misread the post I was replying to. I retract the above statement. Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/