Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267364AbUIFAHj (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Sep 2004 20:07:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267354AbUIFAHj (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Sep 2004 20:07:39 -0400 Received: from omx3-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.20]:912 "EHLO omx3.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267364AbUIFAHX (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Sep 2004 20:07:23 -0400 From: Jesse Barnes To: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: multi-domain PCI and sysfs Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2004 17:06:50 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 Cc: Jon Smirl , lkml References: <9e4733910409041300139dabe0@mail.gmail.com> <200409041603.56324.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> <20040905230425.GU642@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20040905230425.GU642@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200409051706.50455.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1707 Lines: 41 On Sunday, September 5, 2004 4:04 pm, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Sat, Sep 04, 2004 at 04:03:56PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > On Saturday, September 4, 2004 3:45 pm, Jon Smirl wrote: > > > Is this a multipath configuration where pci0000:01 and pci0000:02 can > > > both get to the same target bus? So both busses are top level busses? > > > > > > I'm trying to figure out where to stick the vga=0/1 attribute for > > > disabling all the VGA devices in a domain. It's starting to look like > > > there isn't a single node in sysfs that corresponds to a domain, in > > > this case there are two for the same domain. > > > > Yes, I think that's the case. Matthew would probably know for sure > > though. > > Huh, eh, what? There's no such thing as multipath PCI configurations. > The important concepts in PCI are: Right, but I was answering his question about whether or not there was a place to stick his 'vga' control file on a per-domain basis. There would be if the layout was something like this: /sys/devices/pciDDDD/BB/SS.F/foo rather than the current /sys/devices/pciDDDD:BB/DDDD:BB:SS.F/foo > I haven't really looked at the VGA attribute. I think Ivan or Grant > would be better equipped to help you on this front. I remember them > rehashing it 2-3 years ago. I'm actually ok with a system wide vga arbitration driver, assuming that we'll never have to worry about the scalability of stuff that wants to do legacy vga I/O. Thanks, Jesse - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/