Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267943AbUIFM5V (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Sep 2004 08:57:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267940AbUIFM4R (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Sep 2004 08:56:17 -0400 Received: from rproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.170.196]:25894 "EHLO mproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267957AbUIFM4B (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Sep 2004 08:56:01 -0400 Message-ID: <2f4958ff040906055569642345@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 14:55:57 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Grzegorz_Ja=C5=9Bkiewicz?= Reply-To: =?UTF-8?Q?Grzegorz_Ja=C5=9Bkiewicz?= To: "Dr. Giovanni A. Orlando" Subject: Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives Cc: Tonnerre , Spam , Linus Torvalds , Alan Cox , Jamie Lokier , Horst von Brand , Adrian Bunk , Hans Reiser , viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk, Christoph Hellwig , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Alexander Lyamin aka FLX , ReiserFS List In-Reply-To: <413C2ACF.9060908@futuretg.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20040826150202.GE5733@mail.shareable.org> <20040901200806.GC31934@mail.shareable.org> <1094118362.4847.23.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1591214030.20040902215031@tnonline.net> <20040906074518.GA28697@thundrix.ch> <1873133500.20040906100534@tnonline.net> <20040906085614.GD28697@thundrix.ch> <413C2ACF.9060908@futuretg.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1646 Lines: 42 On Mon, 06 Sep 2004 11:15:59 +0200, Dr. Giovanni A. Orlando wrote: > Tonnerre wrote: > >Because KDE people hate Gnome people and vice versa, and because the > >rest of the world just neglects the two races for political reasons. > This is completely wrong. Neither KDE people hate GNOME people > nor viceversa. > > Time ago, I repeat in a conference the GNOME people need to jump > on the KDE wagon, so the train will move to a single direction, and > people does not approve this comment. > > More than on the license, QPL, there are a developer problem. KDE is covered with LGPL/GPL licence, so is QT, so I don't see a problem here. > Develop in C (Gtk, GNOME) is a lot more easy than develop in C++ > (Qt, KDE) Well, some ppl knowing well C++ will say something completly different. Since I've started QT/KDE development, my life as developer has changed. I am developing everything in QT, as far as desktop stuff goes. And it's much more clear and easier. You just need to lear C++ well ;) > But, for the GUI, the C++ approach is a lot superior ... a lot. > > The problem is this. They start to develop on Gtk to create GNOME, in C > for a license problem. > I don't agree FreeDesktop.org, because it is handled by a RedHat employee > and the code is made on Gtk2, generally. > > ... They are not neutral. Agreed. -- GJ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/