Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268162AbUIFPyI (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Sep 2004 11:54:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268164AbUIFPyI (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Sep 2004 11:54:08 -0400 Received: from host-83-146-9-72.bulldogdsl.com ([83.146.9.72]:31772 "EHLO host-83-146-9-72.bulldogdsl.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268162AbUIFPyF (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Sep 2004 11:54:05 -0400 Message-ID: <1094486042.413c881a748ee@unsolicited.net> Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 16:54:02 +0100 From: David R To: Alan Cox Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arjanv@redhat.com, akpm@osdl.org Subject: Re: PATCH: Misrouted IRQ recovery, take 2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.5 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 438 Lines: 11 Quoting Alan Cox : I'm probably being stupid... but in misrouted_irq(), shouldn't the 'work' flag be reset for each irq, rather than initialised outside the main loop? David - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/