Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267772AbUIGJnB (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Sep 2004 05:43:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267777AbUIGJnB (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Sep 2004 05:43:01 -0400 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:47852 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267772AbUIGJm6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Sep 2004 05:42:58 -0400 Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 11:35:59 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it Cc: akpm@osdl.org, jdike@addtoit.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] uml-ubd-no-empty-queue Message-ID: <20040907093559.GL6323@suse.de> References: <20040906174447.238788D1E@zion.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040906174447.238788D1E@zion.localdomain> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1905 Lines: 51 On Mon, Sep 06 2004, blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it wrote: > > Avoid using, in the UBD driver, the elv_queue_empty function. It's for > the block layer only; in fact, the Anticipatory Scheduler can return NULL > with elv_next_request() even if the queue is not empty, because it waits > for the process to send another request before seeking on the disk. > > In fact, if (with uml-ubd-any-elevator) we let UBD use any scheduler, > elevator=as will make the UBD driver Oops, if we don't have this patch. > > Signed-off-by: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso > --- > > uml-linux-2.6.8.1-paolo/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c | 6 ++---- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff -puN arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c~uml-ubd-no-empty-queue arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c > --- uml-linux-2.6.8.1/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c~uml-ubd-no-empty-queue 2004-08-29 14:40:51.313410952 +0200 > +++ uml-linux-2.6.8.1-paolo/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c 2004-08-29 14:40:51.315410648 +0200 > @@ -1038,8 +1038,7 @@ static void do_ubd_request(request_queue > int err, n; > > if(thread_fd == -1){ > - while(!elv_queue_empty(q)){ > - req = elv_next_request(q); > + while((req = elv_next_request(q)) != NULL){ > err = prepare_request(req, &io_req); > if(!err){ > do_io(&io_req); > @@ -1048,9 +1047,8 @@ static void do_ubd_request(request_queue > } > } > else { > - if(do_ubd || elv_queue_empty(q)) > + if(do_ubd || (req = elv_next_request(q)) == NULL) > return; > - req = elv_next_request(q); > err = prepare_request(req, &io_req); > if(!err){ > do_ubd = ubd_handler; Patch is correct. -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/