Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268966AbUIHCJd (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Sep 2004 22:09:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268970AbUIHCJd (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Sep 2004 22:09:33 -0400 Received: from e32.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.130]:39611 "EHLO e32.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268966AbUIHCJa (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Sep 2004 22:09:30 -0400 Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] cpu hotplug notifier for updating sched domains From: Nathan Lynch To: Nick Piggin Cc: lkml , Andrew Morton , Rusty Russell , Ingo Molnar In-Reply-To: <413E55D8.8030608@cyberone.com.au> References: <200409071849.i87Inw3f143238@austin.ibm.com> <413E55D8.8030608@cyberone.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1094608996.8015.5.camel@booger> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 21:05:02 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 737 Lines: 18 On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 19:44, Nick Piggin wrote: > I think the next step is to now make the setup code only use cpu_online_map > and get rid of everywhere I had been doing cpus_and(tmp, ..., > cpu_online_map). > This may also make your patch 1/2 unnecessary? What do you think? Well, we have to "lie" to arch_init_sched_domains a little bit when bringing a cpu online, by setting the soon-to-be-online cpu's bit in the argument mask. So I think the first patch is still necessary. Nathan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/