Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269147AbUIHN5N (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Sep 2004 09:57:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269106AbUIHNoA (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Sep 2004 09:44:00 -0400 Received: from dragnfire.mtl.istop.com ([66.11.160.179]:7915 "EHLO dsl.commfireservices.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268049AbUIHNmn (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Sep 2004 09:42:43 -0400 Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 09:47:12 -0400 (EDT) From: Zwane Mwaikambo To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: William Lee Irwin III , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Scott Wood Subject: Re: [patch] generic-hardirqs.patch, 2.6.9-rc1-bk14 In-Reply-To: <20040908143143.A32002@infradead.org> Message-ID: References: <20040908120613.GA16916@elte.hu> <20040908133445.A31267@infradead.org> <20040908124547.GA19231@elte.hu> <20040908125755.GC3106@holomorphy.com> <20040908143143.A32002@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 670 Lines: 18 On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 09:34:03AM -0400, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote: > > Hmm, whenever i've brought up weak functions in a patch it's never well > > received. Frankly i prefer it to littering the architectures with similar > > functions. > > That's what we have asm-generic for. So you have an inline function in a header and include it everywhere? How is that better? Zwane - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/