Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263003AbUIHN0i (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Sep 2004 09:26:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267774AbUIHNJ3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Sep 2004 09:09:29 -0400 Received: from mx1.elte.hu ([157.181.1.137]:15756 "EHLO mx1.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267568AbUIHNIl (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Sep 2004 09:08:41 -0400 Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 15:10:15 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Christoph Hellwig , William Lee Irwin III , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Scott Wood Subject: Re: [patch] generic-hardirqs.patch, 2.6.9-rc1-bk14 Message-ID: <20040908131015.GA21470@elte.hu> References: <20040908120613.GA16916@elte.hu> <20040908133445.A31267@infradead.org> <20040908124547.GA19231@elte.hu> <20040908125755.GC3106@holomorphy.com> <20040908140146.A31601@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040908140146.A31601@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-ELTE-SpamVersion: MailScanner 4.31.6-itk1 (ELTE 1.2) SpamAssassin 2.63 ClamAV 0.73 X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-4.9, required 5.9, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -4.90 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamScore: -4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 633 Lines: 16 * Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Personally I'm extremly unhappy with that week model for things like > this. There's no reason why architectures could implement irq > handling as inlines. Or in case of s390 not at all. s390 is a special case i agree - no IRQ handling is a special case. We can exclude kernel/hardirq.o on s390 and all virtual-guest platforms. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/