Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264991AbUIIO3m (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Sep 2004 10:29:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264937AbUIIO3l (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Sep 2004 10:29:41 -0400 Received: from higgs.elka.pw.edu.pl ([194.29.160.5]:61406 "EHLO higgs.elka.pw.edu.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264915AbUIIO3Z (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Sep 2004 10:29:25 -0400 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: Russell King Subject: Re: [patch][9/9] block: remove bio walking Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 16:28:25 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe , Jeff Garzik References: <200409082127.04331.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl> <200409091553.13918.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl> <20040909150444.C6434@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20040909150444.C6434@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200409091628.25304.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1793 Lines: 42 On Thursday 09 September 2004 16:04, Russell King wrote: > On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 03:53:13PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > On Thursday 09 September 2004 10:03, Russell King wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 09:27:04PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > > > [patch] block: remove bio walking > > > > > > > > IDE driver was the only user of bio walking code. > > > > was in -bk10 :-( > > > > > The MMC driver also uses this. Please don't remove. > > > > OK I'll just drop this patch but can't we also use scatterlists in MMC? > > > > The point is that I now think bio walking was a mistake and accessing > > bios directly from low-level drivers is a layering violation (thus > > all the added complexity). Moreover with fixed IDE PIO and without > > bio walking code it should be possible to shrink struct request by > > removing all "current" entries. > > I'm wondering whether it is legal to map onto SG lists and then do PIO. > Provided we don't end up using the DMA API and then using PIO to the > original pages, it should work. Yes, it actually works fine. See the other patches from the patchkit. :-) While at it: AFAICS libata does pci_[un]map_sg() for PIO which is wrong. > I would rather Jens considered your point first before rewriting code. OK > However, using the SG lists does finally provide us with a nice way to > ensure that we have the right information to finally fix IDE wrt the > PIO cache issues (dirty cache lines being left in the page cache.) Could you explain the issue a bit more? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/