Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 21:37:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 21:37:17 -0400 Received: from snowbird.megapath.net ([216.200.176.7]:1547 "EHLO megapathdsl.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 21:37:00 -0400 Message-ID: <3ADB9E59.B4EF71CC@megapathdsl.net> Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 18:37:29 -0700 From: Miles Lane X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-ac2 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "David S. Miller" CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Kernel 2.5 Workshop RealVideo streams -- next time, please get better audio. In-Reply-To: <3ADB922B.4DE1F9A4@megapathdsl.net> <15067.37887.604760.637443@pizda.ninka.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "David S. Miller" wrote: > > Miles Lane writes: > > There is one major shortcoming of the recordings. > > Usually, only the comments of the presenter(s) > > can be heard. > > The problem is that nobody wants to wait for one of the microphones to > go across the entire room before they can begin speaking, this is what > was happening. Sometimes there was a dialogue going on between three > people sitting at tables, there were 2 microphones to go around... > > One solution I've seen sort of work is to have 2 standing fixed > microphones in the isles, but this only really functions correctly > for a Q&A type session after a presentation. > > It does not work in a relaxed "people sit at tables and comment > at arbitrary points in time during a talk" setting such as the > kernel summit. Besides putting a microphone at every table (which > isn't all that practical honestly) I can't come up with a solution. I agree that this is another important issue. It's most important in these events that the flow and exchange of ideas proceed unhindered. I do believe there is a way to record the dialog without introducing significant impediments, though. What usually is done these days, when a few groups of people need to hold a conference call, for example, is that a few omni-directional microphones are used (these are the sort of spaceship-looking things that get placed in the center of a large table around which the groups sit). There are drawbacks with this, in that, for a large group, there's signal loss if current speaker does not face the microphone. However, these microphones do a pretty good job of picking up voice audio in a 360 degree radius. There would need to be some post-event sound mixing. For example, if you have ten tables, each with its own omni-directional table microphone, plus unidirectional microphones for the presenter(s), you'd need to mix the signals from the microphones or perhaps switch between the various microphone recordings and adjust for volume differences. You'd likely get the best recording from the table microphone a particular participant was sitting at. You'd also likely get much stronger signals from the presenter's microphone. What say you all? Cheers, Miles - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/