Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 22:37:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 22:37:48 -0400 Received: from relay1.pair.com ([209.68.1.20]:28683 "HELO relay1.pair.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 22:37:36 -0400 X-pair-Authenticated: 203.164.4.223 From: "Manfred Bartz" Message-ID: <20010417023716.7748.qmail@logi.cc> Lines: 23 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: IP Acounting Idea for 2.5 In-Reply-To: <01041708461209.00352@workshop> <20010416020732.30431.qmail@logi.cc> <20010416224321.O16697@corellia.laforge.distro.conectiva> X-Subversion: anarchy bomb crypto drug explosive fission gun nuclear sex terror In-Reply-To: Harald Welte's message of "Mon, 16 Apr 2001 22:43:21 -0300" Organization: rows-n-columns Date: 17 Apr 2001 12:37:16 +1000 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) XEmacs/21.1 (Bryce Canyon) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Harald Welte writes: > On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 12:07:31PM +1000, Manfred Bartz wrote: > > Resetable counters guarantee that no two programs can co-exists if > > they happen to reset the same counters. > > That sounds like crap (sorry). Care to explain how two independent apps can co-exists if they happen to reset the same counters? > so why are your applications resetting counters then? Ask the authors, not me. I wiped those apps from my system. Its just a pity about the time wasted. > Nobody forces you to reset them right now. Why do authors then write apps (f.e. ipac) which reset counters? Perhaps only because they can, not because it makes sense. -- Manfred Bartz - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/