Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 11:09:03 -0700
From: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>
To: Jakob Oestergaard <jakob@unthought.net>, Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>,
       linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Major XFS problems...
Message-ID: <20040909180903.GA8119@taniwha.stupidest.org>
References: <20040908123524.GZ390@unthought.net> <20040909074046.A3958243@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <20040908232210.GL390@unthought.net> <20040909094255.F3951028@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <20040909121100.GN390@unthought.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040909121100.GN390@unthought.net>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 861
Lines: 29

On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 02:11:00PM +0200, Jakob Oestergaard wrote:

> A google for 'debug.c:106' turns out some 120 results - it seems that no
> special magic is needed, other than a few boxes to set up the test
> scenario.

linux/fs/xfs/support/debuc.c:

    84	void
    85	cmn_err(register int level, char *fmt, ...)
    86	{
[...]
   105		if (level == CE_PANIC)
   106			BUG();
   107	}


Using cmn_err with CE_PANIC will show up as this, so it's likely your
google search is showing multiple different bugs, many of which have
been fixed.  You need to check the stack traces to see if they are the
same.


  --cw
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/