Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265823AbUIIUdR (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Sep 2004 16:33:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266821AbUIIU3u (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Sep 2004 16:29:50 -0400 Received: from mustang.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.3]:45020 "HELO mustang.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S265823AbUIIU1u (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Sep 2004 16:27:50 -0400 Subject: Re: 2.6.9-rc1-mm4 kjournald oops (repeatable) From: Lee Revell To: "Stephen C. Tweedie" Cc: Bongani Hlope , Richard A Nelson , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel In-Reply-To: <1094761240.3047.12.camel@sisko.scot.redhat.com> References: <20040908020402.3823a658.akpm@osdl.org> <1094635403.1985.12.camel@sisko.scot.redhat.com> <1094685396.1362.245.camel@krustophenia.net> <20040909215611.47484cd8@localhost> <1094761240.3047.12.camel@sisko.scot.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1094761676.1362.309.camel@krustophenia.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 16:27:57 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1375 Lines: 31 On Thu, 2004-09-09 at 16:20, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 2004-09-09 at 22:56, Bongani Hlope wrote: > > > Ok it seem I'm not the only one. Ive bee trying to find this for a > > while. It seems to happen on 2.6.9rc1-mm[24] kernels (I haven't tried > > mm[13] ). I was only able to capture the Oops this morning (pen and > > paper) I also have preempt enabled. This only happens on my PII though > > (Mandrake cooker updates and kernel compiles), my dual opteron has > > been running this since last night without any problems (gentoo sync > > and kernel compile), also with preempt > > The journal_clean_checkpoint_list-latency-fix.patch was added in > 2.6.9rc1-mm2 and is still there in mm4, so your problem is also > consistent with a bug in that patch; could you try backing that one diff > out and seeing if it fixes it for you too? > This is not in fact the same journal_clean_checkpoint latency fix that is in the VP patches, looks like that one is just a simple lock break. So, disregard my previous comment, all the evidence does in fact point to journal_clean_checkpoint_list-latency-fix.patch. Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/