Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266878AbUIJHQN (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Sep 2004 03:16:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266837AbUIJHPr (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Sep 2004 03:15:47 -0400 Received: from pimout2-ext.prodigy.net ([207.115.63.101]:36997 "EHLO pimout2-ext.prodigy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264726AbUIJHPo (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Sep 2004 03:15:44 -0400 Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 00:15:30 -0700 From: Chris Wedgwood To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: LKML , Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Separate IRQ-stacks from 4K-stacks option Message-ID: <20040910071530.GB4480@taniwha.stupidest.org> References: <20040909232532.GA13572@taniwha.stupidest.org> <1094798428.2800.3.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> <20040910064519.GA4232@taniwha.stupidest.org> <20040910065213.GA11140@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040910065213.GA11140@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 513 Lines: 20 On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 08:52:13AM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > I just did ;) riiight > the roadmap was > > 8K stacks -> dual 4k/8k option -> 4k stacks URL? also, why 4K and not 8K or 2K? because it's the page size? why not 4K to then on amd64 or ppc64? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/