Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266808AbUIJKQt (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Sep 2004 06:16:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266813AbUIJKQs (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Sep 2004 06:16:48 -0400 Received: from the-village.bc.nu ([81.2.110.252]:57006 "EHLO localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266808AbUIJKQo (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Sep 2004 06:16:44 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Separate IRQ-stacks from 4K-stacks option From: Alan Cox To: arjanv@redhat.com Cc: Chris Wedgwood , LKML , Christoph Hellwig In-Reply-To: <1094798428.2800.3.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> References: <20040909232532.GA13572@taniwha.stupidest.org> <1094798428.2800.3.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1094807650.17041.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 10:14:11 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 682 Lines: 14 On Gwe, 2004-09-10 at 07:40, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > Well I always assumed the future plan was to remove 8k stacks entirely; > 4k+irqstacks and 8k basically have near comparable stack space, with > this patch you create an option that has more but that is/should be > deprecated. I'm not convinced that's a good idea. Its probably appropriate to drop gcc 2.x support at that point too since it's the major cause of remaining problems - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/