Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267473AbUIJPGk (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Sep 2004 11:06:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267460AbUIJPGk (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Sep 2004 11:06:40 -0400 Received: from pimout3-ext.prodigy.net ([207.115.63.102]:15026 "EHLO pimout3-ext.prodigy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267475AbUIJPG1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Sep 2004 11:06:27 -0400 Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 08:06:18 -0700 From: Chris Wedgwood To: "Martin J. Bligh" Cc: Alan Cox , arjanv@redhat.com, LKML , Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Separate IRQ-stacks from 4K-stacks option Message-ID: <20040910150618.GA4857@taniwha.stupidest.org> References: <20040909232532.GA13572@taniwha.stupidest.org> <1094798428.2800.3.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> <1094807650.17041.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> <593560000.1094826651@[10.10.2.4]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <593560000.1094826651@[10.10.2.4]> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 644 Lines: 13 On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 07:30:52AM -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > What problems does it cause? 2.95.4 still seems to work fine for me. Older (and even current) gcc's spill badly in some circumstances and also fail to reuse / better-use spill/stack space. It's been suggested to me that gcc from CVS as of a week ago is much better (i tried buidling it and didn't get far, I'll have to try again) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/