Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 10:36:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 10:36:46 -0400 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:39183 "HELO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 10:36:25 -0400 Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 16:36:23 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: Maneesh Soni Cc: Anton Blanchard , Paul.McKenney@us.ibm.com, dipankar@sequent.com, lkml , lse tech Subject: Re: Scalable FD Management .... Message-ID: <20010417163623.A9336@gruyere.muc.suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20010409201311.D9013@in.ibm.com> <20010411182929.A16665@va.samba.org> <20010412211354.A25905@in.ibm.com> <20010412085118.A26665@va.samba.org> <20010417161916.A11419@in.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010417161916.A11419@in.ibm.com>; from smaneesh@in.ibm.com on Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 04:19:16PM +0530 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 04:19:16PM +0530, Maneesh Soni wrote: > But still the throughput improvement is not there for my patch. the reason, I > think, is that I didnot get too many hits to fget() routine. It will be helpful > if you can tell how you got fget() chewing up more than its fair share of CPU > time. dbench uses fork(), not clone, and therefore has no shared file_structs that could be contended. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/