Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268728AbUILN6O (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Sep 2004 09:58:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268729AbUILN6O (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Sep 2004 09:58:14 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:15578 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268728AbUILN6M (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Sep 2004 09:58:12 -0400 Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 09:58:01 -0400 (EDT) From: James Morris X-X-Sender: jmorris@thoron.boston.redhat.com To: Lee Revell cc: linux-kernel , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] Realtime LSM In-Reply-To: <1094967978.1306.401.camel@krustophenia.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 777 Lines: 29 On Sun, 12 Sep 2004, Lee Revell wrote: > +config SECURITY_REALTIME > + tristate "Realtime Capabilities" > + depends on SECURITY && SECURITY_CAPABILITIES!=y > + default n > + help > + Answer M to build realtime support as a Linux Security > + Module. Answering Y to build realtime capabilities into the > + kernel makes no sense. Why not just make it a bool then? I wonder if it might be better to specify configuration via /proc//attr rather than module parameters. - James -- James Morris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/